vincii we show the working

← Real estate

RITM

Rithm Capital

Real estate · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 1/3
MeasureRITMChecked against
Owner earningspositive
Return on equity8.3%median 11.7%
Debt to equity4.20xmedian 0.79x
Operating margin17.6%median 15.0%

Passes 1 of 3. To be clear: Warren Buffett has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Terry Smith 1/4
MeasureRITMChecked against
Return on capital employed1.8%median 10.1%
Cash conversion-1.85xmedian 1.78x
Operating margin17.6%median 15.0%
Debt to equity4.20xmedian 0.79x

Passes 1 of 4. To be clear: Terry Smith has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Charlie Munger 1/3
MeasureRITMChecked against
Return on capital employed1.8%median 10.1%
Return on equity8.3%median 11.7%
Operating margin17.6%median 15.0%

Passes 1 of 3. To be clear: Charlie Munger has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Chuck Akre 0/4
MeasureRITMChecked against
Return on equity8.3%median 11.7%
Debt to equity4.20xmedian 0.79x
Cash conversion-1.85xmedian 1.78x
Return on equity, sustained6 of 108 of 10 above median

Passes 0 of 4. To be clear: Chuck Akre has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Philip Fisher 2/4
MeasureRITMChecked against
Operating margin17.6%median 15.0%
Net margin15.2%median 10.2%
Return on capital employed1.8%median 10.1%
Operating margin, held or improving17.6%10-yr median 25.7%

Passes 2 of 4. To be clear: Philip Fisher has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Walter Schloss 0/1
MeasureRITMChecked against
Current ratiomedian 1.25x
Debt to equity4.20xmedian 0.79x

Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Walter Schloss has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 0/1
MeasureRITMChecked against
Current ratio2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running5 yrs10 published

Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Benjamin Graham has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 0/1
MeasureRITMChecked against
Return on capital employed1.8%median 10.1%

Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Joel Greenblatt has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 1/2
MeasureRITMChecked against
Debt to equity4.20xmedian 0.79x
Net margin15.2%median 10.2%

Passes 1 of 2. To be clear: Peter Lynch has never said anything about Rithm Capital. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings96.2%
why
Depressed by depreciation on buildings that are not losing value.
Operating cash flownegative
why
Operations consumed $1,292m of cash.
Funds from operations 67.9%
why
The industry's basis — adds that depreciation back.
No free cash flow figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.

Spread between highest and lowest: 28.3 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 46 / 100 — Tight. ? Peer standing 38/50Direction 4/30Stability 4/20

Funds from operations payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2025-12-3167.9%
2024-12-3147.3%
2023-12-3168.8%
2022-12-3144.7%
2021-12-3151.4%
2019-12-31128.1%
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 47.3% to 67.9%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.

76% of the 46 real estate here pay out more — comfortable for the sector.

The arithmetic

- FFO built NAREIT-style: net income, plus real-estate depreciation, less gains on sale, over weighted-average diluted shares

- This is an approximation. Every REIT defines its own adjusted variant in the filing text, so it will not match the earnings release exactly

Where the figures came from

All public at sec.gov — you should not have to take our word for it.

Caveats on this company


Computed straight from SEC XBRL. A number that looks wrong to you is more useful to us than agreement — tell us.

What the funds from operations payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.

Also on: rated tight · when it files.

When this changes

Every figure above is recomputed whenever Rithm Capital files. The monthly letter carries what filed, what moved, and one finding computed across every company here.

Get the letter →